You might not have been familiar with fat freezing or ultrasound cavitation a few years ago, but they are now two of the most widely used therapies for people who want to achieve the body of their dreams.
After all, a patient’s life may be disrupted by hospitalization and lengthy recuperation following typical surgical fat reduction operations. Furthermore, patients are frequently reluctant to have them done because they may leave undesired, permanent scars.
Fortunately, there are less disruptive and risky alternatives to these techniques, such as a top-rated fat-freezing machine and an ultrasound cavitation machine. These techniques can be used alone or in combination with exercise and a nutritious diet for even more significant effects. Let’s examine the key differences between these two procedures.
Cavitation: What is it?
One method for losing weight is ultrasonic cavitation, which reduces fat deposition in specific regions. It is a straightforward method of eliminating body fat without surgery and uses low-frequency sound waves.
Using these low-frequency sound waves to target particular body parts creates pressure inside the fat cells, causing them to rupture and release their contents for natural dispersion throughout the body. Fat cells liquefy and release their contents when gently heated and vibrating.
Once the desired shape is attained, the therapy is permanent and won’t need to be repeated because our fat cells do not multiply, and their number stays comparatively constant. There is no hospital stay, no time off from work, no recuperation period, and no surgery or anesthesia required for the therapy. Fat reduction is noticeable to clients immediately and can last up to 72 hours after treatment.
The most often treated areas are the buttocks, tummy, love handles, male chest, upper arms, inner thighs, and chin. It is particularly effective for eliminating cellulite. Because every patient is unique, some clients experience more drastic weight loss than others, so results vary.
What is the Process of Cavitation?
A maximum of two body parts may be treated in a session, and treatments are typically restricted to 20 minutes per segment. The lymphatic system usually takes five to seven days to release all of the released fats, membranes, and poisons that might have been inside the fat cells. Up to 12 cm of fat may be removed in specific locations throughout six to twelve treatments.
Fat Freezing: What Is It?
Cryolipolysis, also known as fat freezing, is a non-surgical fat reduction procedure that eliminates fat cells using a controlled cooling method. This method is practical and convenient, as it operates as follows.
The Process of Fat Freezing
- A specialized cooling device is first applied to the skin to lower the temperature of the fat cells to about -11°C.
- The fat cells crystallize and ultimately die due to this intense cold, a process known as apoptosis.
- Over time, body fat will gradually decrease as the body’s lymphatic system gradually breaks down and removes the dead fat cells.
Pros of Cavitation and Fat Freezing
Cavitation
- The benefits of fat cavitation include lower costs compared to fat freezing.
- No downtime and the ability to treat more significant regions in a single session
- Within a few weeks, results will be visible.
Freezing Fat
- Targets certain fat deposits (spot decreases fat).
- No downtime
- The results are irreversible.
Pros of Cavitation and Fat Freezing
Cavitation
- For the best outcomes, several treatments could be necessary.
- Not as dramatic of results as fat-freezing
- If not accompanied by an active lifestyle, the effects are semi-permanent.
Freezing Fat
Treatment-related temporary numbness or discomfort.
Results take weeks to manifest.
Key Difference Between Body Sculpting and Fat Freezing
While cavitation and fat freezing are non-surgical methods for eliminating and decreasing fat cells, their approaches are significantly different. Understanding these differences can help you choose the best method for your needs and preferences.
Fat-freezing procedures aim to safely and carefully kill fat cells by freezing them away. Just as a person needs ideal conditions to survive, fat cells also need ideal settings. An FDA-approved device can target fat cells, lowering their temperature and killing them. The body’s lymphatic system then begins eliminating the dead cells as part of the body’s natural defense mechanism.
Cavitation employs a similar strategy and seeks to modify the ideal living circumstances of the fat cell. The primary distinction is that fat cells are heated using high-frequency sound waves approved by the FDA, which causes them to liquefy. The melted fat cells are once more evacuated by the body’s lymphatic system, which then carries them to the liver for processing before the body naturally eliminates them as waste.
Which treatment yields better outcomes with fewer sessions?
Fat-freezing procedures take about four sessions to show their best effects. In contrast, cavitation produces immediate results after just one session, reassuring you that you will see the changes immediately. Fat-freezing depends on extremely low temperatures, which gradually kill the fat cells.
The initial damage to the cells sets off an inflammatory response, which causes them to degrade progressively and eventually die. Thus, achieving this good outcome will take one to three months.
But with cavitation, you may immediately notice a difference. Ultrasonic waves heat fat cells to such a high temperature during therapy that they liquefy. The cavitation device also aids tissue breakdown in the treated areas, further chiseling and thinning the overall appearance. It is important to remember that both operations have long-lasting effects, particularly when paired with a healthy lifestyle.
What is the most comfortable course of treatment?
When comparing the two procedures, it’s commonly believed that ultrasound cavitation is more comfortable than fat freezing. The process is often described as painless and even calming, thanks to the heating component that melts the fat cells away. Importantly, no incisions or anesthetic are required, making it a more pleasant experience for clients.
However, fat freezing may cause additional discomfort. Patients frequently mention the device’s extreme coolness and the tingling and stinging sensation it produces. The sensations go away when the area gets cold enough to become numb. Patients have reported experiencing mild redness, discomfort, and bruises following the surgery, but these are all short-term. It should be emphasized once more that both medications have FDA approval.
Are the costs of these procedures different?
A procedure with an ultrasonic cavitation machine is generally accepted to be 30–50% less expensive than a top-rated fat-freezing machine. However, this could differ from clinic to clinic. We strongly advise looking for a center registered with the CQC when deciding where to receive your treatment option.
Do these operations necessitate lengthy recuperation and rest periods?
Patients who choose a fat-freezing treatment are advised to rest after the surgery. Resting is the best way to long-term recuperate, as some individuals report feeling sore from the device.
Given the uncommon risk of paradoxical adipose hyperplasia, allowing two to five months for a full recovery is advisable. However, you shouldn’t endure any chronic discomfort during this period. After your treatment session, side effects frequently last for a few weeks.
On the other hand, you can finish an ultrasonic cavitation session during your lunch break. Thanks to this easy technique, you can resume regular activities without any worries.
Who is the ideal candidate?
When choosing between fat cavitation and fat freezing, you must take into account the following:
Cavitation
- Bigger treatment areas
- Overall sculpting of the body
- Progressive loss of body fat
Fat Freezing
- Areas of fat that can be pinched
- Nearing the optimal weight
- Seeking more striking and enduring outcomes
Those who are significantly overweight or obese are not eligible for either treatment. The purpose of these therapies is body sculpting.
Selecting the Appropriate Procedure
When contrasting fat freezing and fat cavitation, it is critical to consider your unique wants and objectives. Fat freezing offers long-lasting effects that can persist for at least six months, and it is beneficial for targeting particular locations with recalcitrant fat deposits.
However, fat cavitation is more adaptable and may treat more body parts and areas in a single session. It is a less expensive alternative used with top rated fat freezing machines to improve overall body contouring outcomes.
The decision between fat freezing and cavitation ultimately depends on your tastes, financial situation, and intended results. To choose the best course of action for your needs, speaking with a trained professional is essential. They will evaluate your body fat, discuss your objectives, and suggest the best treatment.
By selecting the appropriate treatment, you can attain the best body contouring outcomes and lead a healthier, more self-assured lifestyle.
Conclusion
The objective of noninvasive body contouring techniques like fat freezing and ultrasonic cavitation is the same: to reduce fat cells and create a leaner shape. While fat freezing operates by freezing fat cells, which are gradually removed from the body, ultrasonic cavitation eliminates fat cells using ultrasonic frequencies.
The treatments are excellent choices because they are quick and don’t require a long recuperation. Results from fat-freezing therapies can take up to three months to manifest and are typically more costly than cavitation. Furthermore, the fat-freezing procedure does not tighten the skin; its benefits are limited to targeted areas. However, skin tightening can also be achieved with ultrasonic fat cavitation, so some patients may benefit from combining the two techniques.
